{"id":6758,"date":"2025-12-11T12:10:15","date_gmt":"2025-12-11T12:10:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/?p=6758"},"modified":"2025-12-11T13:23:38","modified_gmt":"2025-12-11T13:23:38","slug":"api-testing-and-flaky-tests-heres-a-way-to-avoid-it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/api-testing-and-flaky-tests-heres-a-way-to-avoid-it\/","title":{"rendered":"API Testing and Flaky tests: Here\u2019s a way to avoid it"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

Flaky API tests are one of the biggest killers of trust in automation. They pass on one run, fail on the next, and trigger the same internal debate every time: \u201cIs something actually broken, or is our test suite behaving odd again?\u201d<\/i>\u00a0<\/p>

We\u2019ve seen it a thousand times. Whenever a CI\/CD pipeline<\/a> turns red, it\u2019s because a critical API test has failed. The developers stop their work, and everyone tries to figure out what’s broken. Then, someone re-runs the process, and… it passes.\u00a0<\/p>

Why? Because once you and your team lose confidence, they stop taking failures seriously\u2014and your CI pipeline becomes and dead end instead of a gate.\u00a0<\/p>

What exactly is a flaky API test?\u00a0<\/h2>

A flaky API test is one that behaves inconsistently under the same conditions\u2014same code, same environment, same inputs. The key factor to notice here is non-determinism<\/i>. You can re-run it five times and get a mix of passes and failures.\u00a0\u00a0This isn\u2019t bad test writing; it\u2019s usually a signal that something deeper is unstable\u2014timing, dependency calls, shared state, or the environment itself.\u00a0<\/p>

Understanding this helps teams shift from blaming QA to fixing systemic issues in API stability.\u00a0<\/a><\/p>

Why are flaky API tests such a big deal in CI\/CD?\u00a0<\/h2>

CI\/CD pipelines rely on fast, trustworthy feedback loops. Flaky API tests break that trust.\u00a0They slow delivery, cause you to re-run them, hides real issues, and pushes developers toward shortcuts like adding retries just to get a green build. Eventually, people stop paying attention to failures altogether\u2014creating a dangerous \u201cgreen means nothing\u201d tendency.\u00a0<\/p>

\u201cFlakiness is one of the top silent blockers of fast-paced engineering teams.\u201d\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/p>

How to identify if a failed test is flaky or a real defect?\u00a0<\/h3>

Test diagnosis as a process, not a guess.\u00a0Teams typically check:\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0<\/b>Does the test pass on immediate re-run?\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0<\/b>Are related API tests also failing?\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0<\/b>Did the environment show latency spikes?\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0<\/b>Has this test shown inconsistent behavior before?\u00a0<\/p>

Step 1: Capture the Failure Context Immediately<\/b>\u00a0<\/h3>

\u2022\u00a0<\/b>Record:\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u2022 <\/b>Endpoint, payload, headers\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u2022 <\/b>Environment (dev\/stage, build number, commit SHA)\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u2022 <\/b>Timestamps, logs, and any upstream\/downstream calls\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0<\/b>In qAPI, ensure each run stores full request\/response, environment, and log metadata for every test so you always have a forensic snapshot of failures.\u00a0<\/p>

Step 2: Re-run the Same Test in Isolation<\/b>\u00a0<\/h3>

\u2022\u00a0<\/b>Re-run the exact same test:\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u2022\u00a0<\/b>Same environment and with the same payload and preconditions\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0<\/b>Do this\u202fin a way\u202fthat the execution path matches the original:\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u2022\u00a0<\/b>If it fails consistently then there\u2019s strong signal of a real defect.\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u2022 <\/b>If it passes on immediate re-run then we can suspect flakiness.\u00a0<\/p>

Step 3: Check the Test\u2019s History and Stability<\/b>\u00a0<\/h3>

\u2022\u00a0<\/b>Look at the past runs for this specific test:\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u2022 <\/b>Has it been green for weeks and suddenly started failing?\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u2022 <\/b>Has it flipped pass\/fail multiple times across recent builds?\u00a0<\/p>

In qAPI, use trend\/historic test reports and there are two ways to direct this towards:\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0\u2022 <\/b>If the failure starts exactly at a specific commit\/build, lean toward\u202freal defect.\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0\u2022 <\/b>If the same test has intermittent failures across unchanged code, mark it as a\u202fflakiness candidate.\u00a0<\/p>

Step 4: Correlate With Related Tests and Endpoints<\/b>\u00a0<\/h3>

\u2022\u00a0<\/b>Check whether:\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u2022 <\/b>Other tests hitting the same endpoint or business flow also failed.\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u2022 <\/b>Only this single test failed while others touching the same API stayed green.\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0<\/b>In qAPI, you can filter by:\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u2022 <\/b>Endpoint (e.g.,\u202f\/orders\/create)\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u2022 <\/b>Tag\/feature (e.g., \u201ccheckout\u201d, \u201cauth\u201d)\u00a0<\/p>

Step 5: Inspect Environment and Dependencies<\/b>\u00a0<\/h3>

\u2022\u00a0<\/b>Validate:\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u2022 <\/b>Was there an outage or spike in latency on the backend or a thirdparty service?\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u2022 <\/b>Were deployments happening during the run?\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u2022 <\/b>Any DB, cache, or network issues?\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0<\/b>In qAPI, correlate test failure timestamps with:\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u2022 <\/b>API performance metrics\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u2022 <\/b>Error rate charts\u00a0<\/p>

Step 6: Analyze Test Design for Flakiness Triggers<\/b>\u00a0<\/h3>

Review the failing test itself to see if it:\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0<\/b>Does it:\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u2022 <\/b>Depends on shared or preexisting data?\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u2022 <\/b>Uses fixed waits (sleep) instead of polling\/conditions?\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u2022 <\/b>Assumes ordering of records or timing of async operations?\u00a0<\/p>

Step 7: Try Reproducing Locally or in a Controlled Environment<\/b>\u00a0<\/h3>

\u2022\u00a0<\/b>Run the same test:\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u2022 <\/b>Locally (via CLI\/qAPI agent) and in CI\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u2022 <\/b>Against the same environment or new.\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0<\/b>Compare the results to see:\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u2022 <\/b>If it fails everywhere with the same behavior then it\u2019s a\u202freal defect.\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0\u2022 <\/b>If it fails only in specific pipeline\/agent or at random then it\u2019s\u202fflakiness or environment issue.\u00a0<\/p>

Step 8: Decide and Tag: Flaky vs Real Defect<\/b>\u00a0<\/h3>

Make an clear call and record it:\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0<\/b>As real defect when:\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u2022 <\/b>Failure is reproducible on repeated runs.\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u2022 <\/b>It correlates with a recent code\/config change.\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u2022 <\/b>Related tests for the same flow are also failing.\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0<\/b>Classify as flaky when:\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u2022 <\/b>Re-runs intermittently pass.\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u2022 <\/b>History shows pass\/fail flips with no relevant change.\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u2022 <\/b>Root cause factors are timing\/data\/env rather than logic.\u00a0<\/p>

In qAPI you can\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0<\/b>Tag the test (e.g.,\u202fflaky,\u202fenv-dependent,\u202finvestigate).\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u2022 <\/b>Move confirmed flaky tests into a \u201cquarantine\u201d suite so they don\u2019t block merges but still run for data.\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u2022 <\/b>Create a new testing environment directly from qAPI to track fixing the flakiness.\u00a0<\/p>

Step 9: Feed the Learning Back Into Test & API Design<\/b>\u00a0<\/h3>

Once you\u2019ve identified a test as flaky:\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0<\/b>Fix root causes, not just symptoms by:\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u2022 <\/b>Improving test data isolation.\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u2022 <\/b>Replacing hard coding time delays with condition-based waits.\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u2022 <\/b>Strengthen environment stability or add mocks where needed.\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0<\/b>For real defects:\u00a0<\/p>

\u00a0 \u00a0 \u2022 <\/b>Link qAPI\u2019s failed run, logs, and payloads to a ticket so devs have complete context.\u00a0<\/p>

What are the most common causes of flaky API tests?\u00a0<\/h3>

The majority of API flakiness falls into predictable categories:\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0Timing issues:<\/b> relying on fixed waits instead of real conditions.\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0Shared or dirty data:<\/b> test accounts reused across suites.\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0Unstable staging environments:<\/b> multiple teams deploying simultaneously.\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0Third-party API calls:<\/b> rate limits, sandbox inconsistencies.\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0Race conditions:<\/b> async operations not completing in time.\u00a0<\/p>

Once you classify failures into these buckets, you can start projecting patterns\u2014and based on that teams can solve the root cause.\u00a0<\/p>

Can we detect flaky API tests proactively instead of waiting for failures?\u00a0<\/h3>

Yes\u2014teams worldwide are doing it.\u00a0Here\u2019s a short summary of their detection techinques:\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0<\/b>Running critical tests multiple times and measuring variance.\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0<\/b>Tracking historical pass\/fail trends per API.\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0<\/b>Flagging tests with inconsistent outcomes.\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0<\/b>Creating a \u201cTop Flaky API Tests\u201d report weekly.\u00a0<\/p>

Flakiness becomes manageable when it is visible, measured, and reviewed\u2014just like any other quality metric.\u00a0<\/p>

How do we design API tests that are less flaky from day one?\u00a0<\/h3>

Stable API automation comes from building tests that are:\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0Deterministic:<\/b> same input, same output.\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0Data-independent:<\/b> each test owns and cleans up its state.\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0Condition-based:<\/b> waiting for the system to reflect the correct state.\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0Reproducible:<\/b> no hidden randomness or external surprises.\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0API-layer focused:<\/b> validating contracts and flows, not UI noise.\u00a0<\/p>

A good rule that we follow: A test should run in any environment, on any machine, and give the same result every time.<\/i>\u00a0<\/p>

How much flakiness is actually caused by environment issues?\u00a0<\/h3>

Far more than most teams admit. Shared staging environments are notorious for:\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0<\/b>Partial deployments\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0<\/b>Old configuration\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0<\/b>DB resets\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0<\/b>Parallel loads from other teams\u00a0<\/p>

\u2022\u00a0<\/b>Third-party dependency failures\u00a0<\/p>

You can curate the perfect automation strategy and still get flaky results in a noisy environment. This is why modern engineering cultures prefer dedicated environments<\/b> that are lean, isolated, and consistent.\u00a0<\/p>

When the environment stabilizes, the flakiness rate drops dramatically.\u00a0<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

How do you fix flaky tests without slowing delivery?\u00a0<\/h3>

Research and industry experience show that flaky tests aren\u2019t just inconvenient \u2014 they can disrupt your CI\/CD pipelines and waste engineering time. In fact, industry data indicates that flaky tests account for a significant portion of CI failures and engineer effort: one study found that flaky and unstable tests contributed to as much as ~13\u2013<\/b>16% of all test failures<\/b><\/a> in mature organizations\u2019 pipelines.\u00a0<\/p>

Quarantine flaky tests \u2014 but still run them.<\/b>\u00a0Instead of letting flaky tests block merges, isolate them in a separate suite. Run them regularly so you still collect data and trends, but don\u2019t let a flaky failure stop your pipeline.\u00a0<\/p>

Prioritize by impact and frequency.<\/b>\u00a0Not all flaky tests are equal. Fix the tests that fail most often and those covering critical business flows first. A small number of high-impact flakes often cause most CI noise.\u00a0<\/p>

Fix in batches.<\/b>\u00a0Group fixes by root cause \u2014 timing\/synchronization, async behavior, data isolation, environment instability \u2014 and tackle them together. This reduces context switching and produces measurable improvements faster.\u00a0<\/p>

Flakiness Isn\u2019t a QA Problem\u2014It\u2019s an Engineering Culture Problem\u00a0<\/p>

API flakiness exposes weaknesses in environments, data management, architecture, and team processes.\u00a0<\/p>

Fixing it requires collaboration across QA, DevOps, and backend teams\u2014not just \u201cbetter test scripts.\u201d\u00a0<\/h3>

By adopting a systematic approach to diagnosing, prioritizing, and fixing instability, you can transform your automation suite from a source of frustration into a trusted, high-signal safety net. And by choosing a\u202fmodern API testing platform\u202fthat provides the toolkit for flakiness detection, environment management, and AI-assisted diagnosis so that you have lesser problems down the line.\u00a0<\/p>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Flaky API tests are one of the biggest killers of trust in automation. They pass on one run, fail on the next, and trigger the same internal debate every time: \u201cIs something actually broken, or is our test suite behaving odd again?\u201d\u00a0 We\u2019ve seen it a thousand times. Whenever a CI\/CD pipeline turns red, it\u2019s…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":6766,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"content-type":"","inline_featured_image":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[17,10],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6758","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-blog","category-resources"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nAPI Testing and Flaky tests: Here\u2019s a way to avoid it - qAPI<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/api-testing-and-flaky-tests-heres-a-way-to-avoid-it\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"API Testing and Flaky tests: Here\u2019s a way to avoid it - qAPI\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Flaky API tests are one of the biggest killers of trust in automation. They pass on one run, fail on the next, and trigger the same internal debate every time: \u201cIs something actually broken, or is our test suite behaving odd again?\u201d\u00a0 We\u2019ve seen it a thousand times. Whenever a CI\/CD pipeline turns red, it\u2019s...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/api-testing-and-flaky-tests-heres-a-way-to-avoid-it\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"qAPI\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=61571758838201\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-12-11T12:10:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-12-11T13:23:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/qAPI-is-mentioned-in-the-2025-Gartner-Essential-Skills-for-Quality-Engineers-for-API-Testing-Thumbnail-1-1.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1280\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"720\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"KVivek@quinnox.com\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@testwithqapi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@testwithqapi\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"KVivek@quinnox.com\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/api-testing-and-flaky-tests-heres-a-way-to-avoid-it\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/api-testing-and-flaky-tests-heres-a-way-to-avoid-it\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"KVivek@quinnox.com\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/#\/schema\/person\/7e289616502d4a54537b9238abfcb6c5\"},\"headline\":\"API Testing and Flaky tests: Here\u2019s a way to avoid it\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-11T12:10:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-12-11T13:23:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/api-testing-and-flaky-tests-heres-a-way-to-avoid-it\/\"},\"wordCount\":1494,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/api-testing-and-flaky-tests-heres-a-way-to-avoid-it\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/qAPI-is-mentioned-in-the-2025-Gartner-Essential-Skills-for-Quality-Engineers-for-API-Testing-Thumbnail-1-1.png\",\"articleSection\":[\"Blog\",\"Resources\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/api-testing-and-flaky-tests-heres-a-way-to-avoid-it\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/api-testing-and-flaky-tests-heres-a-way-to-avoid-it\/\",\"name\":\"API Testing and Flaky tests: Here\u2019s a way to avoid it - qAPI\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/api-testing-and-flaky-tests-heres-a-way-to-avoid-it\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/api-testing-and-flaky-tests-heres-a-way-to-avoid-it\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/qAPI-is-mentioned-in-the-2025-Gartner-Essential-Skills-for-Quality-Engineers-for-API-Testing-Thumbnail-1-1.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-12-11T12:10:15+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-12-11T13:23:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/api-testing-and-flaky-tests-heres-a-way-to-avoid-it\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/api-testing-and-flaky-tests-heres-a-way-to-avoid-it\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/api-testing-and-flaky-tests-heres-a-way-to-avoid-it\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/qAPI-is-mentioned-in-the-2025-Gartner-Essential-Skills-for-Quality-Engineers-for-API-Testing-Thumbnail-1-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/qAPI-is-mentioned-in-the-2025-Gartner-Essential-Skills-for-Quality-Engineers-for-API-Testing-Thumbnail-1-1.png\",\"width\":1280,\"height\":720},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/api-testing-and-flaky-tests-heres-a-way-to-avoid-it\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"API Testing and Flaky tests: Here\u2019s a way to avoid it\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/\",\"name\":\"qAPI\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/#organization\",\"name\":\"qAPI\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/qAPI-Youtube-DP-98-x-98.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/qAPI-Youtube-DP-98-x-98.png\",\"width\":409,\"height\":409,\"caption\":\"qAPI\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=61571758838201\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/testwithqapi\",\"https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/testwithqapi\/?viewAsMember=true\",\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/testwithqapi\/\",\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@testwithqapi\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/#\/schema\/person\/7e289616502d4a54537b9238abfcb6c5\",\"name\":\"KVivek@quinnox.com\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/db31e9174ebfa9ab633a260baf037a4bd7953297bc36d362e5295fcd07a5b70c?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/db31e9174ebfa9ab633a260baf037a4bd7953297bc36d362e5295fcd07a5b70c?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"KVivek@quinnox.com\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/author\/kvivekquinnox-com\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"API Testing and Flaky tests: Here\u2019s a way to avoid it - qAPI","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/api-testing-and-flaky-tests-heres-a-way-to-avoid-it\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"API Testing and Flaky tests: Here\u2019s a way to avoid it - qAPI","og_description":"Flaky API tests are one of the biggest killers of trust in automation. They pass on one run, fail on the next, and trigger the same internal debate every time: \u201cIs something actually broken, or is our test suite behaving odd again?\u201d\u00a0 We\u2019ve seen it a thousand times. Whenever a CI\/CD pipeline turns red, it\u2019s...","og_url":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/api-testing-and-flaky-tests-heres-a-way-to-avoid-it\/","og_site_name":"qAPI","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=61571758838201","article_published_time":"2025-12-11T12:10:15+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-12-11T13:23:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1280,"height":720,"url":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/qAPI-is-mentioned-in-the-2025-Gartner-Essential-Skills-for-Quality-Engineers-for-API-Testing-Thumbnail-1-1.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"KVivek@quinnox.com","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@testwithqapi","twitter_site":"@testwithqapi","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"KVivek@quinnox.com","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/api-testing-and-flaky-tests-heres-a-way-to-avoid-it\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/api-testing-and-flaky-tests-heres-a-way-to-avoid-it\/"},"author":{"name":"KVivek@quinnox.com","@id":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/#\/schema\/person\/7e289616502d4a54537b9238abfcb6c5"},"headline":"API Testing and Flaky tests: Here\u2019s a way to avoid it","datePublished":"2025-12-11T12:10:15+00:00","dateModified":"2025-12-11T13:23:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/api-testing-and-flaky-tests-heres-a-way-to-avoid-it\/"},"wordCount":1494,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/api-testing-and-flaky-tests-heres-a-way-to-avoid-it\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/qAPI-is-mentioned-in-the-2025-Gartner-Essential-Skills-for-Quality-Engineers-for-API-Testing-Thumbnail-1-1.png","articleSection":["Blog","Resources"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/api-testing-and-flaky-tests-heres-a-way-to-avoid-it\/","url":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/api-testing-and-flaky-tests-heres-a-way-to-avoid-it\/","name":"API Testing and Flaky tests: Here\u2019s a way to avoid it - qAPI","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/api-testing-and-flaky-tests-heres-a-way-to-avoid-it\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/api-testing-and-flaky-tests-heres-a-way-to-avoid-it\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/qAPI-is-mentioned-in-the-2025-Gartner-Essential-Skills-for-Quality-Engineers-for-API-Testing-Thumbnail-1-1.png","datePublished":"2025-12-11T12:10:15+00:00","dateModified":"2025-12-11T13:23:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/api-testing-and-flaky-tests-heres-a-way-to-avoid-it\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/api-testing-and-flaky-tests-heres-a-way-to-avoid-it\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/api-testing-and-flaky-tests-heres-a-way-to-avoid-it\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/qAPI-is-mentioned-in-the-2025-Gartner-Essential-Skills-for-Quality-Engineers-for-API-Testing-Thumbnail-1-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/qAPI-is-mentioned-in-the-2025-Gartner-Essential-Skills-for-Quality-Engineers-for-API-Testing-Thumbnail-1-1.png","width":1280,"height":720},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/api-testing-and-flaky-tests-heres-a-way-to-avoid-it\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"API Testing and Flaky tests: Here\u2019s a way to avoid it"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/#website","url":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/","name":"qAPI","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/#organization","name":"qAPI","url":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/qAPI-Youtube-DP-98-x-98.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/qAPI-Youtube-DP-98-x-98.png","width":409,"height":409,"caption":"qAPI"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/profile.php?id=61571758838201","https:\/\/x.com\/testwithqapi","https:\/\/www.linkedin.com\/company\/testwithqapi\/?viewAsMember=true","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/testwithqapi\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/@testwithqapi"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/#\/schema\/person\/7e289616502d4a54537b9238abfcb6c5","name":"KVivek@quinnox.com","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/db31e9174ebfa9ab633a260baf037a4bd7953297bc36d362e5295fcd07a5b70c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/db31e9174ebfa9ab633a260baf037a4bd7953297bc36d362e5295fcd07a5b70c?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"KVivek@quinnox.com"},"url":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/author\/kvivekquinnox-com\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6758","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6758"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6758\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6772,"href":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6758\/revisions\/6772"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6766"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6758"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6758"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/qyrus.com\/qapi\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6758"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}